Skip to content

Reconcile cart abandonment with order status

Compare missing purchase events with linked order and payment data. Three fictional journeys show different next investigations.

Anna Neumann2 min read
Grey and green payment terminal with a white check mark in a green circle on its display; beside it, a receipt with cart and check symbols.

I would reconcile a reported cart abandonment rate with the associated order states before using it to justify a product change. If a browser purchase event is missing, several journeys remain possible. The technical decision needs to distinguish recording, actual completion and unknown intent.

Events describe a recorded step

Google Analytics documents separate events for cart, checkout and purchase. add_to_cart describes adding an item to the cart, begin_checkout the start of order completion and purchase the recorded purchase. These events need suitable implementation in the application. Their names alone do not establish complete recording of all actual transactions.

Three journeys with different consequences

The following table is our own fictional dataset. All findings apply within the same defined observation period and assume that source mapping has been checked.

Transaction

Recorded browser journey

Additional established state

Next investigation

W-A

add_to_cart; no begin_checkout or purchase

No associated order

Investigate cart use; intent remains unknown

W-B

begin_checkout; no purchase

No confirmed order; associated payment attempt declined

Investigate this payment error specifically

W-C

begin_checkout; no purchase

Associated order and successful payment confirmed

Check event recording; do not treat the confirmed purchase as missing

A combined number without this distinction can direct the team to the wrong task. For W-C, these data would not justify a new payment method. First establish why the purchase event is missing from the recording being examined. For W-A, claiming that the person only wanted to compare prices would also lack evidence.

Define the reconciliation scope, then decide

Specify observation period, mapping and the completion state that governs the assessment. A late order or an unresolved payment needs defined handling. Use suitable test data to reconcile recorded steps with actual test transactions.

A consistently defined aggregate can still show development over time and trigger investigation. It does not replace establishing the specific journey. If sources cannot be linked reliably, classification remains open too. The first development task may then be missing mapping or recording, before changing the purchase journey itself.

Sources

Written by

  • Anna NeumannEditor for Content and Digital MarketingAnna Neumann plans and writes content on digital marketing at ASES. Her topics include search engine optimisation, content strategy and web analytics, with a focus on evaluating marketing activities and their results in a transparent way.

Follow ASES

Read more

All articles

E-Commerce with ASES

Online shops, marketplaces and B2B portals